No Child Left Behind Doomed To Fail?


A reader recently emailed me and pointed me to a recent article on regarding No Child Left Behind. She wanted my take on the article, so here goes…

To begin with, I notice that the article is written by Claudia Wallis, a writer of incredible credentials. This is a great start. The article begins:

There was always something slightly insane about No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the ambitious education law often described as the Bush Administration’s signature domestic achievement.

I understand this view, but to me it comes across as sounding much like every single faculty meeting I have ever been in that discussed NCLB and its “ridiculous expectations for the students.” Every time I hear this, I laugh to myself. I understand that NCLB does not test the students — NCLB tests the teachers and administrators.

My experience tells me that many teachers and administrators mislead the students about how their personal performance on standardized tests will impact the students. Here is one such example.

I agree that NCLB is ill-conceived and I personally disagree with most any governmental attempt at regulating what should be regulated by free enterprise. On that note, the article continues:

Add to the mix the fact that much of the promised funding failed to materialize and many early critics insisted that No Child Left Behind was nothing more than a cynical plan to destroy American faith in public education and open the way to vouchers and school choice.

Ms. Wallis might lump me in what she calls the “blow-up-the-schools group,” but so be it. I have no problem with schools, but I am very much a supporter of the voucher concept where competition helps to improve schools across the board.

The article continues and discusses some of the behind-the-scenes goings on that happened within the Department of Education within the last few years. On that topic, the article actually does help to shed some light on some of the possible reasoning behind the the basis of the law and some of its inherent flaws.

Something that I have found to be true when I left the Dallas/Fort Worth area and moved to the Texas-Mexico border is addressed in the article’s concluding paragraph:

[M]uch of the achievement gap between rich and poor “is rooted in what occurs outside of formal schooling,” and therefore calls on policymakers to “rethink their assumptions” about what it will take to close that gap.

This was recently highlighted to me as I looked up the difference between a school being “Academically Unacceptable,” “Academically Acceptable,” “Recognized,” and “Exemplary” according to Texas’ accountability ratings system. All of these descriptions are stolen from the linked Wikipedia article.

To be Acceptable, the criteria are 65 percent on TAKS Subsections “Social Studies”, “Reading/ELA”, and “Writing”, 45 percent on “Mathematics”, and 40 percent on “Science”, 50 percent on SDAA II, 75 percent on Completion Rate, and 1.0 percent on Dropout Rate.

When be Recognized, the criteria are 75 percent pass rate on TAKS and SDAA II (again, required for all students as well as each subgroup), 85 percent on Completion Rate, and 0.7 percent on Dropout Rate.

Exemplary is substantially harder. In order to receive an Exemplary rating, a school/district must meet all four of the following criteria:

  • TAKS (TM) Test Passing – At least 90 percent of all students must pass the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) test overall and on each of five subsections (Reading/ELA, Writing, Social Studies, Mathematics, and Science); in addition, each “subgroup” (African American, Hispanic, White, and Economically Disadvantaged) must also meet the 90 percent criterion overall and in each subsection (provided there are enough students to meet “minimum size” requirements)
  • SDAA II Test Passing – At least 90 percent of all students must pass the State-Developed Alternative Assessment II (SDAA II) test, which is required for only those students for whom the TAKS test is not an acceptable measurement (subgroup criterion does not apply)
  • Completion Rate – At least 95 percent of all students, as well as 95 percent of each subgroup listed under the TAKS test, must either have completed or are continuing their education four years after entering high school (this criterion applies to high schools and districts only)
  • Dropout Rate – No more than 0.2 percent of all students, as well as no more than 0.2 percent of each subgroup, can have dropped out of school.

As you can see, the change from Acceptable to Recognized is most drastic with the mathematics and science tests. Schools and districts are rated using the same criteria. A district can be acceptable and still have exemplary schools. It is also interesting to note that the TEA standards and the NCLB standards are not aligned, thus causing even further confusion.

My guess is that No Child Left Behind is not doomed to fail

In its current inception, the public school system in many states seems set to implode, but the law itself will stay on the books. I think it will be drastically changed by the end of next school year, but will stick around. Why? As one of my former principals astutely pointed out, who is the politician who wants to leave children behind?

About Joel Wagner 522 Articles
Joel Wagner (@sywtt) began teaching band in 2002. Though he had a lot of information, his classes were out of control. He found himself tired, frustrated, disrespected by students, lonely, and on the brink of quitting. He had had enough. He resigned from his school district right before spring break of his second year and made it his personal mission to learn to be a great teacher. So You Want To Teach? is the ongoing story of that quest for educational excellence.

8 Comments on No Child Left Behind Doomed To Fail?

  1. Thanks Benjamin for the great article! I modified the second sentence of the last paragraph from “In its current inception, the public school system is set to implode, but the law itself will stay on the books.” to “In its current inception, the public school system in many states seems set to implode, but the law itself will stay on the books.” and included the link.

  2. Are they kidding? Children ARE being left behind every single day! No matter how hard teachers work, there are some students and their parents who just don’t care. I think parents need to be highly involved in the equation. They need to be held responsible for attendance, attitudes, and homework. I am tired of the lack of support we get from parents. We do get a lot of blame when the child doesn’t achieve though. I have had parents who claimed their child did fantastic in a different school and when their records came it was a lie. They had the same problems including lack of parental support. If we don’t get the parents involved in the children’s education again, we will never have a successful school system. The reason Charter schools in Arizona are so good is because they require parents to volunteer so many hours a month. Lots of parent involvement. Lots of parent donations. Lots of parents caring what happens in their children’s lives. In public school, the parents often just think that the school should be totally responsible for the children. I have been yelled at by parents because I gave homework. They should do all their work at school. It isn’t the parents job to teach. Holy Cow! I think every parent needs to come to school at least once a month to see their child in action and watch their children’s teachers. Now, THAT would make a difference.

  3. @Mystery Teacher – I agree absolutely. The problem is that whenever governments try to legislate things, it simply bogs them down rather than propelling them forward. Involved parents are the single largest difference between most “good students” and “bad students.”

  4. As a college student in education we are always having NCLB drilled into our brains, but the truth is children are left behind. I do agree that NCLB grades the teachers and administrators. What I believe needs to happen is educational reform, where we take what studies suggest and put them into action.

  5. @Stephanie – Educational reform sounds good. So where does that educational reform begin? I am rather unorthodox in how I see things a lot of the time (could you guess that already?) and I am just sick of new programs that start up and never are allowed to run their course.

    It’s like a new study comes out saying this technique or method works well. The district will jump on board. Then another study comes out a year later saying something somewhat similar and yet somewhat different. Too many districts are too quick to jump ship and follow after the new program.

    I have come to learn in the music world that rebuilding a high school music program takes at a minimum 4 years before the results of the hard work begin to be fully seen. It takes somewhere around 5-8 years before the program can be turned around completely — even by the most expert directors.

    Educational reform tends to go the same way. If we want to fix our district’s low scores from the LEP students, we need to choose our course, and commit to it for a few years and see what the results end up being.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.